After Kings Charles I and II, many were surprised that there is a third | Curio

After Kings Charles I and II, many were surprised that there is a third

11 mins | Invalid Date

The first was a tyrant, the other a playboy. King Charles III's choice to keep his name has surprised some British historians and royal commentators due to negative historical associations. But, as Emilie M. Brinkman explains, it also invokes the rich cultural legacy of his predecessors as the United Kingdom enters a new era.

publisher logo

From The Washington Post

Read along